بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث), greater disease (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), nn decrease (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث), greater disease (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), nn decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
14681
Data Sheet 2_Saikosaponin A induces cellular senescence in triple-negative breast cancer by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway.docx
منشور في 2025"…Existing therapeutic agents are generally accompanied by significant side effects. Here, we highlight Saikosaponin A (SSA), a promising natural metabolite characterized by low toxicity, demonstrating significant efficacy against breast cancer through the induction of cellular senescence.…"
-
14682
Table 4_Trends in immune cell profiles of osteomyelitis: a clinical study supported by Mendelian randomization analysis.docx
منشور في 2025"…Subgroup analysis revealed significantly increased lymphocyte counts and decreased neutrophil counts across all subgroups, except for the mixed infection group. …"
-
14683
Table 7_Burden of malaria in the Comoros, 1990–2021: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021.xlsx
منشور في 2025"…Over the past 32 years, the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in the ASPR was statistically significant at −7.60% (t = −2.68, p < 0.05). Moreover, the annual percentage change (APC) in ASIR and ASPR showed the most significant decline from 2012 to 2015, with APCs of −70.47% (t = −3.01, p < 0.05) and − 66.55% (t = −14.94, p < 0.05), respectively.…"
-
14684
Table 6_Burden of malaria in the Comoros, 1990–2021: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021.xlsx
منشور في 2025"…Over the past 32 years, the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in the ASPR was statistically significant at −7.60% (t = −2.68, p < 0.05). Moreover, the annual percentage change (APC) in ASIR and ASPR showed the most significant decline from 2012 to 2015, with APCs of −70.47% (t = −3.01, p < 0.05) and − 66.55% (t = −14.94, p < 0.05), respectively.…"
-
14685
Control analyses of behavioral timescales.
منشور في 2025"…<b>(B)</b> Two location task example: We observed no statistically significant differences between different smoothing windows for the two location task, but for the four location task (two locations: <i>F</i>3,39 = 1.35, <i>p</i> = 0.2727; four locations: <i>F</i>3,39 = 32.15, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, repeated-measures ANOVA). …"
-
14686
Table 5_OSH45, a homeobox transcription factor, coordinates low-phosphate adaptation in rice.xlsx
منشور في 2025"…<p>Phosphorus (P), an essential macronutrient critical for plant growth and development, faces significant availability constraints in agricultural soils, substantially limiting crop yield potential. …"
-
14687
Table 1_Assessment of platelet-to-white blood cell ratio on short-term mortality events in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure: evidence from a cohort stud...
منشور في 2025"…Further threshold analysis revealed a threshold point for PWR at 15.88, where a decrease in PWR below this threshold was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (p for log-likelihood ratio test = 0.046). …"
-
14688
Data Sheet 1_Post-COVID syndrome patients show reduced anti-Spike antibodies compared to COVID-recovered controls, but enhanced IgG4/IgG1 switch after the third vaccine dose.pdf
منشور في 2025"…Introduction<p>Long COVID and post-COVID syndromes represent a significant global health crisis and a substantial societal challenge. …"
-
14689
Table 1_Unpacking the cost implications of diagnosis-related groups reform for lumbar disc herniation patients in Chinese medicine: a closer look at evidence from China.xls
منشور في 2025"…Objectives<p>Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) presents a significant economic burden globally, worsening in China due to an aging population. …"
-
14690
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14691
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14692
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14693
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14694
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14695
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14696
Data Sheet 1_Virological response and predictive factors for antiviral treatment in chronic HBV-related liver disease with low ALT and high HBV DNA.docx
منشور في 2025"…</p>Methods<p>A retrospective study grouped chronic HBV patients by baseline ALT: ALT > 80 U/L (significantly elevated group, SAG), 40-80 U/L (mildly elevated group, MAG), and ≤ 40 U/L (normal group, NG). …"
-
14697
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14698
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14699
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
14700
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"