Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater increase » year increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater increase » year increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
821
-
822
SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
823
-
824
SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
825
-
826
-
827
-
828
-
829
-
830
-
831
-
832
-
833
Pre-RT and post RT D-dimer levels in associated with prognostic significance.
Published 2025Subjects: -
834
Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth.
Published 2025Subjects: -
835
-
836
-
837
-
838
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
839
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
840