Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
2401
-
2402
-
2403
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
2404
-
2405
-
2406
-
2407
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
2408
-
2409
-
2410
-
2411
-
2412
-
2413
-
2414
-
2415
-
2416
-
2417
-
2418
-
2419
Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and total area reduction ratio of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) during follow-up.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) During the follow-up period, the stable group showed no significant change in visual acuity, whereas the progression group exhibited a decrease compared to baseline starting at 12 months, with greater changes than those in the stable group beginning at 6 months. …”
-
2420