Showing 881 - 900 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((greatest decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 0.42s Refine Results
  1. 881

    Image 5_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  2. 882

    Image 3_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  3. 883

    Image 1_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  4. 884

    Image 4_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  5. 885
  6. 886
  7. 887
  8. 888
  9. 889
  10. 890
  11. 891
  12. 892
  13. 893

    NLSs can significantly impact intranuclear stages of HIV-1 infection. by Nicholas Rohlfes (20577485)

    Published 2025
    “…Statistical analysis in A,B,D and F was determined using one-way ANOVA and in E and H using Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences are indicated: ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001, **** P<0.0001. …”
  14. 894
  15. 895
  16. 896
  17. 897
  18. 898
  19. 899
  20. 900