Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
level increased » levels increased (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), gene increased (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
level increased » levels increased (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), gene increased (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
-
19001
Primer sequences used in this study.
Published 2024“…Further analysis of its expression during reproductive caste differentiation showed that its expression levels increased prior to molting into reproductive individuals, even during the winged imago (alates) stage. …”
-
19002
-
19003
Overall structure of DSConv.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19004
FE_Block.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19005
Fabric defect samples.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19006
Structure of CPCA.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19007
Comparison of CPCA attention mechanism effects.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19008
Overall structure of EMA attention mechanism.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19009
FE_C2f.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19010
PConv structure.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19011
Improved DCFE-YOLOv8 algorithm.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19012
Experimental environment configuratio.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19013
Model comparison experiments.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19014
Comparison of different attention mechanisms.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19015
Ablation experiments of different modules.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in detection performance. Specifically, mAP@0.5 increased by 2.9%, precision improved by 3.5%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 rose by 2.3%, highlighting the model’s superior capability in detecting complex defects. …”
-
19016
-
19017
Footprints of Pr77<sup>Gag</sup> on the WT and LRI-I mutant packaging signal RNAs.
Published 2024“…All nucleotides that show a reactivity decrease >40% upon Gag addition, also show statistically significant difference according to the Mann–Whitney non parametrical U test (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
19018
Footprints of Pr77<sup>Gag</sup> on the WT structure model.
Published 2024“…All nucleotides that show a reactivity decrease >40% upon Gag addition, also show statistically significant difference according to the Mann–Whitney non parametrical U test (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
19019
Footprints of Pr77<sup>Gag</sup> on WT and LRI-IV mutant packaging signal RNAs.
Published 2024“…All nucleotides that show a reactivity decrease >40% upon Gag addition, also show statistically significant difference according to the Mann–Whitney non parametrical U test (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
19020
Comparison of iKIR score interaction terms for the 9 protective genotypes in a generalized linear model (GLM) vs a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a relatedness matrix.
Published 2024“…Red lines now denote the significance level (α = 0.05) and the grey line is again the line of identity. …”