Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
levels decreased » levels increased (Expand Search)
level decrease » level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
levels decreased » levels increased (Expand Search)
level decrease » level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
-
2861
-
2862
-
2863
-
2864
-
2865
-
2866
-
2867
-
2868
Cyanoamino acid metabolism.
Published 2025“…We further constructed the pathway for cyanide amino acid metabolism under B stress and found that miR408c-5p targeted the gene controlling β -glucosidase 18, and the expression level was notably decreased. It was speculated that B stress hindered soybean growth by inhibiting amino acid metabolism and affecting other metabolic pathways. …”
-
2869
Expression analysis of miRNAs by qRT-PCR.
Published 2025“…We further constructed the pathway for cyanide amino acid metabolism under B stress and found that miR408c-5p targeted the gene controlling β -glucosidase 18, and the expression level was notably decreased. It was speculated that B stress hindered soybean growth by inhibiting amino acid metabolism and affecting other metabolic pathways. …”
-
2870
-
2871
-
2872
<i>Oenocarpus bacaba</i> palm tree (A) and fruit (B).
Published 2024“…Serological cure was achieved in 34.6% of cases, and IgG titers decreased in 15.3%.</p><p>Conclusions and significance</p><p>We encountered several barriers in managing ACD, including population vulnerability, reliance on outdated diagnostic techniques, lack of standardized molecular biology methods, and limited therapeutic options. …”
-
2873
-
2874
-
2875
Regression results of the Callaway method.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2876
Regression results of crowding out effects.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2877
Article data.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2878
Overidentification test results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2879
Quantile regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2880
Instrumental variable regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”