Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
Shows the amount of emission reductions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
62
Comparison COP of our study with Florides et al.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
63
Effect of generator temperature on COP.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
64
Emission factors.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
65
Magnitude of emission reduction.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
66
Assumed conditions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
67
Fixed simulation data.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
68
pone.0324800.t002 -
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
69
Impact of heat exchanger effectiveness on COP.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
70
Assumed conditions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
71
Assumed conditions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
72
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
73
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
74
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
75
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
76
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
77
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
78
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
79
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
80