Showing 9,141 - 9,160 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((mean decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 0.62s Refine Results
  1. 9141

    FK506 significantly potentiates caspofungin activity against tolerant <i>C. tropicalis</i> strains, reversing tolerance phenotypes in both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> models... by Yongqin Wu (272012)

    Published 2025
    “…(F) FK506 substantially decreases the fungal load in <i>G. mellonella</i> larvae infected with tolerant strains and treated with caspofungin. …”
  2. 9142

    Data extracted from the included studies. by Jesse Hill (19929059)

    Published 2024
    “…Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. …”
  3. 9143

    Risk of bias assessments for controlled trials. by Jesse Hill (19929059)

    Published 2024
    “…Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. …”
  4. 9144
  5. 9145
  6. 9146
  7. 9147

    Flow chart of the literature search. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  8. 9148

    Funnel plot for scar thickness. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  9. 9149

    Network plot for VSS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  10. 9150

    Network plot for scar thickness. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  11. 9151

    Funnel plot for VSS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  12. 9152

    Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17). by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  13. 9153

    Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  14. 9154

    Network plot for VAS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  15. 9155

    Funnel plot for VAS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  16. 9156
  17. 9157
  18. 9158
  19. 9159
  20. 9160