Differences in immune infiltration between NAFLD and control groups. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Swelling pressure versus free swelling ratio curve. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

Shematic representation for the mechanism of the swelling pressure: (a)soil without added fiber; (b)soil with added fiber. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

Influence of UHMWPE length on swelling pressure. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

UHMWPF parameters. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

The test results of swelling pressure of reinforced expansive soil. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

Influence of UHMWPE content on swelling pressure. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

Sampling point (Source: by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

Enrichment Analysis Based on Ferroptosis-Related Differentially Expressed Genes. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Correlation between hub genes and 50 hallmark signaling pathways. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

ROC curves for hub genes. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Intersection genes obtained from the PPI network and PPI network analysis of intersection genes. colored circles represent genes. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Expression profile heatmaps of key genes in gene sets. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Influence of UHMWPE length on free swelling ratio. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

Construction of the WGCNA Co-expression Network. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Influence of UHMWPE content on free swelling ratio. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

Soil partice-size distribution. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

Subjects:

Differential Gene Expression Associated with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Interaction analysis of hub genes. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”