Showing 3,381 - 3,400 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((new decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.74s Refine Results
  1. 3381
  2. 3382
  3. 3383
  4. 3384
  5. 3385
  6. 3386
  7. 3387
  8. 3388
  9. 3389
  10. 3390
  11. 3391
  12. 3392
  13. 3393
  14. 3394

    Testing set error. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  15. 3395

    Internal structure of an LSTM cell. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  16. 3396

    Prediction effect of each model after STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  17. 3397

    The kernel density plot for data of each feature. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  18. 3398

    Analysis of raw data prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  19. 3399

    Flowchart of the STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  20. 3400

    SARIMA predicts season components. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”