Showing 641 - 660 results of 1,661 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((new decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 641

    S1 Data - by George Mrema (19550255)

    Published 2024
    “…During this period, the point prevalence of leprosy declined from 0.32 to 0.25 per 10,000 people, and the new case detection rate decreased from 3.1 to 2.4 per 100,000 people; however, these changes were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). …”
  2. 642

    (a) Molds; (b) Samples; (c)(d) Test devices. by Chenhao Li (822769)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the disposal of large quantities of construction waste clay, this study proposes a new method for preparing controlled low strength materials (CLSM). …”
  3. 643
  4. 644
  5. 645

    Minimal data set. by Zhaoping Meng (4875040)

    Published 2025
    “…Over-exploitation of wild resources led to the rise of cultivation, along with a decrease in quality. Exposure of plants to adversity must generate substantial quantities of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and result in cellular damage. …”
  6. 646
  7. 647
  8. 648
  9. 649

    SlABCG9 Functioning as a Jasmonic Acid Transporter Influences Tomato Resistance to Botrytis cinerea by Ning Tao (109880)

    Published 2025
    “…Assays using Xenopus oocytes, yeast cell sensitivity, and JA-inhibited primary root growth confirmed that SlABCG9 functions as a JA influx transporter. The knockout mutant lines of <i>SlABCG9</i> showed decreased JA contents, suppressed defense gene <i>PDF1.2</i>’s expression, reduced antioxidant enzyme activity, and severe disease symptoms compared to wild-type controls. …”
  10. 650
  11. 651
  12. 652

    (a) Cement; (b) SHMP; (c) Water glass; (d) PG. by Chenhao Li (822769)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the disposal of large quantities of construction waste clay, this study proposes a new method for preparing controlled low strength materials (CLSM). …”
  13. 653
  14. 654

    Flow chart of research object screening. by Wenyao Xie (21567889)

    Published 2025
    “…In fully adjusted models, each 10 ng/dL increase in testosterone was associated with a 3.0% decrease in ALI (OR=0.970, 95%CI: 0.962–0.978, P < 0.001), while each 1 pg/mL increase in estradiol was associated with a 60.3% increase in ALI (OR=1.603, 95%CI: 1.318–1.949, P < 0.001). …”
  15. 655
  16. 656

    Overall model framework. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  17. 657

    Key parameters of LSTM training model. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  18. 658

    Comparison chart of model evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  19. 659

    Model performance evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  20. 660

    The result compared with other existing methods. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”