Showing 701 - 720 results of 24,549 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((nn decrease) OR (greater increase)) ))', query time: 0.38s Refine Results
  1. 701
  2. 702
  3. 703

    Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  4. 704

    Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  5. 705
  6. 706
  7. 707
  8. 708
  9. 709
  10. 710
  11. 711
  12. 712
  13. 713
  14. 714

    Analyses excluding participants with BMI 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or greater from healthy volunteer groups. by Gabriela Ribeiro (4748373)

    Published 2024
    “…Similarly to the original analyses in the full data set (<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002936#pbio.3002936.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1F</a>), there was a significant post-conditioning increase in preference among participants with low preference at baseline (t<sub>(23)</sub> = 2.7; <i>P</i> = 0.01; <i>n</i> = 24) but not in those with higher baseline preference (t<sub>(19)</sub> = 0.05; <i>P</i> = 0.96; <i>n</i> = 20). …”
  15. 715
  16. 716
  17. 717
  18. 718
  19. 719
  20. 720