Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
241
Fecal egg count reduction percentage (FECRP).
Published 2025“…Statistically, there was a significant decrease in EPG values from days 0–14. …”
-
242
Baseline demographic characteristics.
Published 2025“…Group 2 exhibited a significantly greater decrease in GCC thickness compared with Group 1(P = 0.026).…”
-
243
-
244
Participant characteristics.
Published 2025“…The risk factor prevalences that decreased significantly were: inadequate physical activity from 5.0% in 2014 to 3.6% in 2023 (p=0.003), and current smoke tobacco use from 9.6% in 2014, to 8.3% in 2023 (p= 0.046). …”
-
245
Uganda 2023 NCD risk factor STEPS survey data.
Published 2025“…The risk factor prevalences that decreased significantly were: inadequate physical activity from 5.0% in 2014 to 3.6% in 2023 (p=0.003), and current smoke tobacco use from 9.6% in 2014, to 8.3% in 2023 (p= 0.046). …”
-
246
Uganda 2014 NCD risk factor STEPS survey data.
Published 2025“…The risk factor prevalences that decreased significantly were: inadequate physical activity from 5.0% in 2014 to 3.6% in 2023 (p=0.003), and current smoke tobacco use from 9.6% in 2014, to 8.3% in 2023 (p= 0.046). …”
-
247
S1 Data -
Published 2025“…This interaction was further supported by a significant decrease of ALK phosphorylation in single and combination treatment with 300nM ABT-199. …”
-
248
Maximum voluntary contraction assessment.
Published 2025“…The post hoc test shows systematically higher percentage values in the CAI group, results which non remain throughout the trials. The percentage of activation in the left PLL maximum peak right-hand layup is higher in the non CAI group with a large effect size in single measurements. …”
-
249
-
250
-
251
DIP grouping and aggregation system.
Published 2025“…The growth rate of total costs slowed (surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −14.10; non-surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −10.76). Total costs in the non-surgical group showed a decreasing trend post-DIP intervention (β<sub>1</sub> + β<sub>3</sub> = −3.12). …”
-
252
DIP coding logic example.
Published 2025“…The growth rate of total costs slowed (surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −14.10; non-surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −10.76). Total costs in the non-surgical group showed a decreasing trend post-DIP intervention (β<sub>1</sub> + β<sub>3</sub> = −3.12). …”
-
253
DIP pre-payment and provider behavior mechanism.
Published 2025“…The growth rate of total costs slowed (surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −14.10; non-surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −10.76). Total costs in the non-surgical group showed a decreasing trend post-DIP intervention (β<sub>1</sub> + β<sub>3</sub> = −3.12). …”
-
254
(a to g) Administration of vitamin D3 increased serum phosphorus and triglycerides.
Published 2025“…Analyses of serum cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides also showed a non-significant decrease in the serum HDL level upon treatment with 125 µg/Kg vitamin D3, but a noticeable increase in the serum triglyceride level was observed with 125 µg/Kg of vitamin D3.…”
-
255
-
256
-
257
-
258
<i>Aedes aegypti</i> database from SAGO traps.
Published 2025“…IVM treatment reduced the number of females per trap per week from 3.29 ± 0.24 to 2.41 ± 0.20 (33.7% reduction), AGO from 1.58 ± 0.17 to 0.25 ± 0.05 (85.2% reduction), and AGO + IVM from 1.49 ± 0.17 to 0.53 ± 0.08 (67.78% reduction), based on Henderson’s formula. We observed a non-significant increase in the control area (no treatment provided) in the mosquito populations, increasing from 2.94 ± 0.24 in the pretreatment period to 3.25 ± 0.28 of the post treatment period.…”
-
259
-
260