Showing 241 - 260 results of 2,564 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((non decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.41s Refine Results
  1. 241

    Fecal egg count reduction percentage (FECRP). by Sohail Afzal (10850709)

    Published 2025
    “…Statistically, there was a significant decrease in EPG values from days 0–14. …”
  2. 242

    Baseline demographic characteristics. by Jung-Tae Kim (8997767)

    Published 2025
    “…Group 2 exhibited a significantly greater decrease in GCC thickness compared with Group 1(P = 0.026).…”
  3. 243
  4. 244

    Participant characteristics. by Ronald Kusolo (13200268)

    Published 2025
    “…The risk factor prevalences that decreased significantly were: inadequate physical activity from 5.0% in 2014 to 3.6% in 2023 (p=0.003), and current smoke tobacco use from 9.6% in 2014, to 8.3% in 2023 (p= 0.046). …”
  5. 245

    Uganda 2023 NCD risk factor STEPS survey data. by Ronald Kusolo (13200268)

    Published 2025
    “…The risk factor prevalences that decreased significantly were: inadequate physical activity from 5.0% in 2014 to 3.6% in 2023 (p=0.003), and current smoke tobacco use from 9.6% in 2014, to 8.3% in 2023 (p= 0.046). …”
  6. 246

    Uganda 2014 NCD risk factor STEPS survey data. by Ronald Kusolo (13200268)

    Published 2025
    “…The risk factor prevalences that decreased significantly were: inadequate physical activity from 5.0% in 2014 to 3.6% in 2023 (p=0.003), and current smoke tobacco use from 9.6% in 2014, to 8.3% in 2023 (p= 0.046). …”
  7. 247

    S1 Data - by Richard Junior Zapata Dongo (17912565)

    Published 2025
    “…This interaction was further supported by a significant decrease of ALK phosphorylation in single and combination treatment with 300nM ABT-199. …”
  8. 248

    Maximum voluntary contraction assessment. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

    Published 2025
    “…The post hoc test shows systematically higher percentage values in the CAI group, results which non remain throughout the trials. The percentage of activation in the left PLL maximum peak right-hand layup is higher in the non CAI group with a large effect size in single measurements. …”
  9. 249
  10. 250
  11. 251

    DIP grouping and aggregation system. by Chenxuan Zhu (22622476)

    Published 2025
    “…The growth rate of total costs slowed (surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −14.10; non-surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −10.76). Total costs in the non-surgical group showed a decreasing trend post-DIP intervention (β<sub>1</sub> + β<sub>3</sub> = −3.12). …”
  12. 252

    DIP coding logic example. by Chenxuan Zhu (22622476)

    Published 2025
    “…The growth rate of total costs slowed (surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −14.10; non-surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −10.76). Total costs in the non-surgical group showed a decreasing trend post-DIP intervention (β<sub>1</sub> + β<sub>3</sub> = −3.12). …”
  13. 253

    DIP pre-payment and provider behavior mechanism. by Chenxuan Zhu (22622476)

    Published 2025
    “…The growth rate of total costs slowed (surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −14.10; non-surgical group: β<sub>3</sub> = −10.76). Total costs in the non-surgical group showed a decreasing trend post-DIP intervention (β<sub>1</sub> + β<sub>3</sub> = −3.12). …”
  14. 254

    (a to g) Administration of vitamin D3 increased serum phosphorus and triglycerides. by Vidya G. Bettada (22208808)

    Published 2025
    “…Analyses of serum cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides also showed a non-significant decrease in the serum HDL level upon treatment with 125 µg/Kg vitamin D3, but a noticeable increase in the serum triglyceride level was observed with 125 µg/Kg of vitamin D3.…”
  15. 255
  16. 256
  17. 257
  18. 258

    <i>Aedes aegypti</i> database from SAGO traps. by Jesús A. Aguilar-Durán (9931967)

    Published 2025
    “…IVM treatment reduced the number of females per trap per week from 3.29 ± 0.24 to 2.41 ± 0.20 (33.7% reduction), AGO from 1.58 ± 0.17 to 0.25 ± 0.05 (85.2% reduction), and AGO + IVM from 1.49 ± 0.17 to 0.53 ± 0.08 (67.78% reduction), based on Henderson’s formula. We observed a non-significant increase in the control area (no treatment provided) in the mosquito populations, increasing from 2.94 ± 0.24 in the pretreatment period to 3.25 ± 0.28 of the post treatment period.…”
  19. 259
  20. 260