Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
781
Relative Variable Importance.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Climate change has emerged as a significant driver of biodiversity loss, with profound implications for species distribution. …”
-
782
Analysis of differential microbiome and classification prediction model between case and control groups.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Linear discriminant analysis [LDA; (log10)>2] and (B) effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.01) in the microbiota of the case (orange, negative score) and control groups (blue, positive score) groups. …”
-
783
SLC response kinematics at 28 dpf.
Published 2025“…<p>(A-B) C1 is the first C-bend performed. The angle and duration of the C1 bend is not significantly altered at this time point. …”
-
784
Study sample.
Published 2025“…One increased National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score decreased adjusted BI scores by 3.6.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The time after discharge, gender, stroke subtype, and stroke severity are significant factors affecting functional outcomes after a stroke. …”
-
785
Sample size in each occupational subgroup.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
786
Correlation between different study variables.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
787
Study flow diagram.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
788
Final data used in the study.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
789
Demographic characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, an increase of one point in work ability score leads to a decrease in WMSDs in the neck, wrists/hands, low back and hips/thighs regions by 13.5%, 8%, 11.5%, and 9%, respectively.…”
-
790
-
791
-
792
Schematic model depicting the relationship between lipids and proteins by target gene knockdown.
Published 2025“…Non-significant but decreasing trends are marked with small light blue arrows pointing downwards. …”
-
793
GNB1 and SCARB2 involvement in lipid metabolism of human subcutaneous adipocytes.
Published 2025“…In the schematic diagram, significant increases are indicated by red arrows pointing upwards, while significant decreases are shown by blue arrows pointing downwards. …”
-
794
Dataset visualization diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
795
Dataset sample images.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
796
Performance comparison of different models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
797
C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
798
YOLOv8n detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
799
YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
800
BiFormer structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”