Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
rate decreased » rate increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
rate decreased » rate increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
2541
-
2542
-
2543
-
2544
-
2545
Kenya: Enrolment, time to IVA, mortality, admissions and readmissions at sites in Kenya.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2546
-
2547
-
2548
-
2549
-
2550
Flowchart of the screening process.
Published 2025“…Using PRISMA 2020, the “Yes” response rate for Q5, Q8, and Q15 was below 55 percent. Per ROBIS, all SRs/MAs exhibited low risk in phase 1 and domain 1 but high risk in domain 2. …”
-
2551
Result of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.
Published 2025“…Using PRISMA 2020, the “Yes” response rate for Q5, Q8, and Q15 was below 55 percent. Per ROBIS, all SRs/MAs exhibited low risk in phase 1 and domain 1 but high risk in domain 2. …”
-
2552
Characteristics of included reviews.
Published 2025“…Using PRISMA 2020, the “Yes” response rate for Q5, Q8, and Q15 was below 55 percent. Per ROBIS, all SRs/MAs exhibited low risk in phase 1 and domain 1 but high risk in domain 2. …”
-
2553
Result of the PRISMA assessments.
Published 2025“…Using PRISMA 2020, the “Yes” response rate for Q5, Q8, and Q15 was below 55 percent. Per ROBIS, all SRs/MAs exhibited low risk in phase 1 and domain 1 but high risk in domain 2. …”
-
2554
Result of the ROBIS assessments.
Published 2025“…Using PRISMA 2020, the “Yes” response rate for Q5, Q8, and Q15 was below 55 percent. Per ROBIS, all SRs/MAs exhibited low risk in phase 1 and domain 1 but high risk in domain 2. …”
-
2555
-
2556
-
2557
-
2558
-
2559
-
2560