Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
ratio decreased » rate decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
ratio decreased » rate decreased (Expand Search)
-
1581
-
1582
-
1583
Electromagnetic torque ripple.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1584
The evolution.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1585
ANN architecture.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1586
Electromagnetic torque ripple comparison.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1587
Evolution.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1588
ANN architecture and configuration.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1589
Mechanical speed.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1590
Wind speed profile.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1591
Correlation coefficient (R).
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1592
Electromagnetic torque.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1593
Training performance (MSE).
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1594
Illustration of BSC control using ANN for WECS.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1595
d-axis current.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1596
System parameters.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1597
q-axis current.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1598
Schematic representation of WECS.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1599
THD for the stator current i<sub>sb</sub> (ANN-BSC).
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”
-
1600
THD for the stator current i<sub>sb</sub> (OTC-FOC).
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. …”