Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
rise decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
use decreased » use increased (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
rise decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
use decreased » use increased (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search)
-
141
Variables name and variable measurement.
Published 2025“…The results showed that DRG reduced total hospital costs, patient cost-sharing, patient sharing ratio, and length of stay, but did not significantly affect the rising 30-day readmission rates. …”
-
142
Online travelogues information from Ctrip.
Published 2025“…Findings indicate that: (1) Locations mentioned in Tang and Song poetry show significant spatial differentiation, with urban areas displaying a clustered distribution and suburbs showing scattered hotspots. (2) The number of locations referenced in Song poetry increased significantly compared to Tang poetry, suggesting that Nanjing’s economic growth heightened the city’s appeal and inspired more literary output. (3) Song Dynasty poetry reflects a shift toward more neutral and negative emotions, with a marked decrease in positive expressions. …”
-
143
-
144
Behaviour and significance of reservoir evaporation and seepage losses – an experience of four reservoirs in Damodar River Valley, India
Published 2025“…Frequency of seepage varied significantly with the season or month. It increased noticeably with rise of operating level. …”
-
145
Spatial Markov transfer matrix (<i>k</i> = 4).
Published 2025“…The results show a significant improvement in accessibility of tourist attractions from 2015 to 2024, with average travel time to tourist attractions at the county level decreasing from 65 to 41 minutes, and the proportion of areas reachable within 60 minutes rising from 62.5% to 92.3%. …”
-
146
Roadmap of the technical approach.
Published 2025“…The results show a significant improvement in accessibility of tourist attractions from 2015 to 2024, with average travel time to tourist attractions at the county level decreasing from 65 to 41 minutes, and the proportion of areas reachable within 60 minutes rising from 62.5% to 92.3%. …”
-
147
Speed and time cost for different road types.
Published 2025“…The results show a significant improvement in accessibility of tourist attractions from 2015 to 2024, with average travel time to tourist attractions at the county level decreasing from 65 to 41 minutes, and the proportion of areas reachable within 60 minutes rising from 62.5% to 92.3%. …”
-
148
Scope of the study area.
Published 2025“…The results show a significant improvement in accessibility of tourist attractions from 2015 to 2024, with average travel time to tourist attractions at the county level decreasing from 65 to 41 minutes, and the proportion of areas reachable within 60 minutes rising from 62.5% to 92.3%. …”
-
149
Time cost of natural environment.
Published 2025“…The results show a significant improvement in accessibility of tourist attractions from 2015 to 2024, with average travel time to tourist attractions at the county level decreasing from 65 to 41 minutes, and the proportion of areas reachable within 60 minutes rising from 62.5% to 92.3%. …”
-
150
Traditional Markov transfer matrix (<i>k</i> = 4).
Published 2025“…The results show a significant improvement in accessibility of tourist attractions from 2015 to 2024, with average travel time to tourist attractions at the county level decreasing from 65 to 41 minutes, and the proportion of areas reachable within 60 minutes rising from 62.5% to 92.3%. …”
-
151
-
152
ASIR prediction from 2020 to 2030 by sex.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The study reveals a significant rise in Age-Standardized Incidence Rates (ASIR) for breast cancer among females in Saudi Arabia from 1990 to 2019, with Oman experiencing the highest increase and Kuwait the highest decrease. …”
-
153
List of primers used for RT-qPCR experiments.
Published 2024“…We showed that BST2 silencing resulted in a significant rise in viral production during multi-cycle infection, suggesting an inhibitory role during the late steps of RSV’s multiplication cycle. …”
-
154
Excel data used for developing Fig 1, 2, and 3.
Published 2025“…The study revealed a significant rise in malaria prevalence, highlighting that malaria remains a major public health issue in the study area. …”
-
155
Frontier Analysis Based on ASDR and SDI.
Published 2025“…From 1990 to 2021, the ASDR for hypertension-related AA decreased by 54.08% and 15.56% in high-SDI and upper-middle-SDI regions, respectively, while it increased by 25.23%, 62.02%, and 17.99% in middle-SDI, lower-middle-SDI, and low-SDI regions. …”
-
156
LULC proportion from 2040 to 2060.
Published 2025“…The study highlighted significant land-use changes, with increased agriculture and built-up areas at the expense of forests and pasturelands. …”
-
157
Global sensitive flow parameters [84].
Published 2025“…The study highlighted significant land-use changes, with increased agriculture and built-up areas at the expense of forests and pasturelands. …”
-
158
Data set from the 2022 study.
Published 2025“…The study population was compared to other rural areas in Denmark using data collected in 2021 from a nationwide probability survey of cat owners. …”
-
159
Improving QoL through the use of STAT-ON™.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting millions of patients worldwide, with significant economic and social implications. The increasing prevalence of PD, coupled with rising healthcare costs, necessitates cost-effective solutions for patient management. …”
-
160
Patients outcome.
Published 2025“…Reliance on temporal-artery biopsy fell (17% vs 91%; p < 0.01), owing to a four-fold rise in diagnostic MRI use. Mean total medical costs decreased by €814 per patient (€3672 ± 2861 vs €4486 ± 3193), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.23).…”