Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sd increase » _ increase (Expand Search), 7 increase (Expand Search), fold increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sd increase » _ increase (Expand Search), 7 increase (Expand Search), fold increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
S1 File -
Published 2024“…Body size, body composition, and maturity had a significant, but of moderate power, effect on the selection. …”
-
7
Flowchart of the selection program.
Published 2024“…Body size, body composition, and maturity had a significant, but of moderate power, effect on the selection. …”
-
8
-
9
Study group background characteristics.
Published 2024“…In this sample set, only direct <b><i>HIVE</i></b> in the <b><i>HAD</i></b> group and, to a lesser degree, in the <b><i>NSE</i></b> group was associated with elevated median albumin ratios. Minor, though not significant, increases were present in the <b><i>RxNFL+</i></b> group. …”
-
10
Table 1_A study on the effects of modified sprint interval trainingon physical fitness test scores and the quantitative and dose-response relationships among Chinese male universit...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>The results showed significant improvements in key anaerobic capacity indicators after the 6-week intervention: Average Power (AP) increased from 77.4 ± 10.1 to 132.6 ± 21.1 (p < 0.01, Adjusted p < 0.03 ment, with a maximum effect size of 3.344), Peak Power (PP) increased from 102.9 ± 14.5 to 189.5 ± 28.8 (p < 0.01, Adjusted p < 0.02, maximum effect 3.790), and Time to Peak Power (TTP) decreased from 12.3 ± 3.3 to 9.5 ± 2.6 (p < 0.01), confirming that the intervention enhanced the participants' anaerobic capacity. …”