Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
701
-
702
-
703
Performance comparison of different models on PeMSD4 and PeMSD8 at different forecasting interval.
Published 2025Subjects: -
704
-
705
-
706
Comparative analysis of predictive performance of different variant models.
Published 2025Subjects: -
707
-
708
-
709
-
710
-
711
-
712
-
713
-
714
-
715
-
716
-
717
-
718
Significant inter-relationships between baseline variables and MSCC or MCS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
719
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
720