Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
761
-
762
-
763
-
764
The error between test and simulation results.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
765
Relevant parameters of cutting head and pick.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
766
The stress variation of Node 33.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
767
Deformation trend of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
768
Force transformation of cutting head.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
769
3D model of cutting head.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
770
Rigid-flexible coupling mode.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
771
The flow of cutting performance calculation.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
772
Results of different optimization schemes.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
773
Modal shape of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
774
Deformation variation of Node 33.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
775
Optimization parameters of gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
776
Property parameters of rock samples.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
777
Modal frequency of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
778
Optimized design nodes of different parameters.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
779
Fatigue life distribution of gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
780
Force analysis of cutting pick.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”