Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
881
-
882
-
883
-
884
-
885
The error between test and simulation results.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
886
Relevant parameters of cutting head and pick.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
887
The stress variation of Node 33.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
888
Deformation trend of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
889
Force transformation of cutting head.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
890
3D model of cutting head.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
891
Rigid-flexible coupling mode.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
892
The flow of cutting performance calculation.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
893
Results of different optimization schemes.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
894
Modal shape of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
895
Deformation variation of Node 33.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
896
Optimization parameters of gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
897
Property parameters of rock samples.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
898
Modal frequency of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
899
Optimized design nodes of different parameters.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
900
Fatigue life distribution of gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”