بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
side decrease » sizes decrease (توسيع البحث), fid decreased (توسيع البحث), step decrease (توسيع البحث)
year increase » linear increase (توسيع البحث), may increase (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
side decrease » sizes decrease (توسيع البحث), fid decreased (توسيع البحث), step decrease (توسيع البحث)
year increase » linear increase (توسيع البحث), may increase (توسيع البحث)
-
20081
Long-term tillage and cover cropping differentially influenced soil nitrous oxide emissions from cotton cropping system
منشور في 2025"…However, their influence on nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions varies, with the potential of both increasing and decreasing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. …"
-
20082
Table 1_Effects of singing on vascular health in older adults with coronary artery disease: a randomized, crossover trial.docx
منشور في 2025"…The low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio increased by 2.80 (SE: 1.03, p = 0.008), and the natural logarithm of high frequency (LnHF) power decreased by −0.90 ms<sup>2</sup> (SE: 0.29, p = 0.003) with the video (during to pre-change). …"
-
20083
Table 1_The interaction between temperature and rainfall determines the probability of tropical forest fire occurrence in Hainan Island.docx
منشور في 2025"…The results show that: (1) climatic factors contribute most significantly to the tropical forest fire probability, followed by human activities and topography, while vegetation factors (i.e., normalized difference vegetation index) made no significant contribution; (2) temperature and rainfall are the dominant factors influencing fire probability, with rising temperatures and decreasing rainfall substantially increasing the forest fire hazard; and (3) both logistic regression and random forest are reliable for predicting tropical forest fire hazards, but random forest demonstrates greater adaptability. …"
-
20084
Table 2_Untargeted metabolic analysis in serum samples reveals metabolic signature in children with congenital heart failure on enalapril therapy.csv
منشور في 2025"…Introduction<p>Enalapril is an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEi) which is widely used in the management of (paediatric) hypertension and heart failure (HF). There is a significant interindividual variability in the patient's response to enalapril that is not completely understood. …"
-
20085
Data Sheet 1_Synchronized nutrition fertilizer improves soil microbial diversity and sugarcane yield through agrochemical and enzymatic regulation.docx
منشور في 2025"…In mechanism, SNFert not only supplemented nutrients, but also enriched soil microbial diversity by increasing soil pH and decreasing soil salinity and mineral nutrient residues, thereby improving soil properties and increasing sugarcane yield in 2020.…"
-
20086
Table 1_Untargeted metabolic analysis in serum samples reveals metabolic signature in children with congenital heart failure on enalapril therapy.csv
منشور في 2025"…Introduction<p>Enalapril is an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEi) which is widely used in the management of (paediatric) hypertension and heart failure (HF). There is a significant interindividual variability in the patient's response to enalapril that is not completely understood. …"
-
20087
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20088
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20089
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20090
Data Sheet 1_Postoperative pain outcomes following uniportal vs. multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.pdf
منشور في 2025"…Meta-regression identified a decrease in effect sizes over time (β = 0.05 per year, p = 0.024). …"
-
20091
Data Sheet 1_Enhancing AAV-microdystrophin gene therapy after repeat dosing by blocking phagocytosis.docx
منشور في 2025"…</p>Results<p>Viral load was significantly increased by 77-fold in white blood cells after two rAAV9-microdystrophin doses compared to mice receiving a single dose. …"
-
20092
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20093
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20094
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20095
Data Sheet 1_Virological response and predictive factors for antiviral treatment in chronic HBV-related liver disease with low ALT and high HBV DNA.docx
منشور في 2025"…</p>Methods<p>A retrospective study grouped chronic HBV patients by baseline ALT: ALT > 80 U/L (significantly elevated group, SAG), 40-80 U/L (mildly elevated group, MAG), and ≤ 40 U/L (normal group, NG). …"
-
20096
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20097
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20098
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20099
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
20100
data_EMFT.rar
منشور في 2025"…Further analysis reveals the followings: (1) Companies with more deposits and loans exhibit a significantly stronger degree of cash flow manipulation for higher credit ratings, and their probability of subsequent semi-annual cash stock reversal is notably increased. (2) Listed companies that default on bonds demonstrate significantly stronger cash flow manipulation in the year preceding the bond issuance, indicating that cash flow manipulation for higher credit ratings exacerbates bond defaults. …"