Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
Connectivity maps and color maps of within-group analysis of the tDCS intervention.
Published 2024“…<p>The colored edge represents connections with significant differences. Data represent the delta-value of the mean oscillation of the frequency band from pre- to post-treatment in each brain region. …”
-
103
Modeling method used.
Published 2025“…Urban vegetation significantly influences larval presence, although higher vegetation index values correlate with a decreased probability of larval occurrence. …”
-
104
Flowchart of the study population.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The mean age of study participants was 57 years and women reported significantly higher stress levels on PSS-10 than men [Women: 13.6 ± 5.6; Men: 12.4 ± 5.3; p < 0.01]. …”
-
105
Characteristics of study population.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The mean age of study participants was 57 years and women reported significantly higher stress levels on PSS-10 than men [Women: 13.6 ± 5.6; Men: 12.4 ± 5.3; p < 0.01]. …”
-
106
Long-term divergence of nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in small lakes across China
Published 2025“…Eastern Plains lakes had the highest mean TN/TP ratios (48.2 ± 13.7) and the fastest decrease (-1.565/decade). …”
-
107
Microplastics Influence Dissolved Organic Matter Transformation Mediated by Microbiomes in Soil Aggregates
Published 2025“…MPs were found to increase DOM transformation in soil aggregates, leading to changes in soil aggregate stability, including a reduction in geometric mean diameter and mass-weighted diameter. The addition of MPs resulted in a decrease in the stability of DOM in large-sized aggregates but an increase in the aromaticity and unsaturation of DOM in small-sized aggregates, which were more pronounced in the PLAMPs-treated group. …”
-
108
Algorithm training accuracy experiments.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
109
Repeat the detection experiment.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
110
Detection network structure with IRAU [34].
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
111
Ablation experiments of various block.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
112
Kappa coefficients for different algorithms.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
113
The structure of ASPP+ block.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
114
The structure of attention gate block [31].
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
115
DSC block and its application network structure.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
116
The structure of multi-scale residual block [30].
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
117
The structure of IRAU and Res2Net+ block [22].
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
118
-
119
-
120
Data Sheet 1_Hemodynamic changes and their relationship with white matter hyperintensities in CSVD patients with cognitive impairment: a 4D flow study.pdf
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>The CSVD with CI population reported a statistically significant decrease in flow rate, blood flow velocity, and WSS, as well as an increase in PI, RI, CSF flow quantity, and velocity compared to age-matched cognitively healthy control participants. …”