Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
small increased » soil increased (Expand Search)
Showing 361 - 380 results of 689 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((small decrease) OR (small increased)) ))~', query time: 0.32s Refine Results
  1. 361
  2. 362
  3. 363

    Supporting datasets for all figures. by Matthew Drill (22258391)

    Published 2025
    “…Inhibition of P2X7R with small molecule antagonist AZ10606120, for 72 hours significantly decreased U251 cell number (p < 0.0001), and significantly increased tumour cell death, as evidenced by increased LDH release (p < 0.001). …”
  4. 364

    Microplastics Influence Dissolved Organic Matter Transformation Mediated by Microbiomes in Soil Aggregates by Xinran Qiu (9182255)

    Published 2025
    “…The addition of MPs resulted in a decrease in the stability of DOM in large-sized aggregates but an increase in the aromaticity and unsaturation of DOM in small-sized aggregates, which were more pronounced in the PLAMPs-treated group. …”
  5. 365

    Flowchart of the study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  6. 366

    Characteristics of study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  7. 367

    RFAConv working principle. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  8. 368

    PConv working principle. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  9. 369

    Improvement of SPPF to SPPF-R process. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  10. 370

    PR comparison on RSOD dataset. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  11. 371

    Ablation study on the RSOD dataset. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  12. 372

    Structure and working principle of LI-YOLOv8. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  13. 373

    C2f-E improvement process. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  14. 374

    Structure of Detect and GP-Detect. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  15. 375

    YOLOv8 structure and working principle. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  16. 376

    Improvement of CBS to CBR process. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  17. 377

    EMA attention mechanism working principle. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  18. 378

    Ablation study on the NWPU VHR-10 dataset. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  19. 379

    GSConv working principle. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  20. 380

    PR comparison on NWPU VHR-10 dataset. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”