Showing 1 - 19 results of 19 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((soil increased) OR (greatest decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.42s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Chemical properties of the soil. by Dominika Radzikowska-Kujawska (14439076)

    Published 2025
    “…In the control, CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation was practically inhibited due to drought (98% drop), while in the plants in which the Trichoderma preparation was used together with half dose of NPK and manure, there was only a slight decrease (1% and 13% respectively). A greatest, significant improvement in the DM of roots under drought was noted in plants in which the Pisum forecrop was applied together with NPK and manure (230% and 168% respectively). …”
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Targeted removal robustness analysis. by Fei Wang (19534)

    Published 2025
    “…TK, SOM, SUE and SALP had significant effects on the bacterial community structure of all three taxa. βNTI increased significantly with increasing differences in TN and ALSP and decreased with increasing differences in salt. …”
  13. 13

    The network parameter at different distances. by Fei Wang (19534)

    Published 2025
    “…TK, SOM, SUE and SALP had significant effects on the bacterial community structure of all three taxa. βNTI increased significantly with increasing differences in TN and ALSP and decreased with increasing differences in salt. …”
  14. 14

    Data Sheet 1_The cultivation of Panax notoginseng enhances the metabolites and microbial network complexity in the soil of Pinus armandii rather than Pinus kesiya.docx by Jingying Hei (20655971)

    Published 2025
    “…Moreover, the bacterial and fungal copy numbers, alpha- and beta-diversity, remained unchanged in the soil of P. armandii, but significantly decreased in the soil of P. kesiya following Sanqi planting. …”
  15. 15

    Data declaration. by Mengting Jin (1888933)

    Published 2025
    “…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”
  16. 16

    Land transfer parameters. by Mengting Jin (1888933)

    Published 2025
    “…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”
  17. 17

    Technology roadmap. by Mengting Jin (1888933)

    Published 2025
    “…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”
  18. 18

    Local details of carbon storage. by Mengting Jin (1888933)

    Published 2025
    “…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”
  19. 19

    Land-use type areas in Xinjiang. by Mengting Jin (1888933)

    Published 2025
    “…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”