Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
soil increased » fold increased (Expand Search), showed increased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
soil increased » fold increased (Expand Search), showed increased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Changes of exchangeable calcium carbonate content during acification of black soil.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Chemical properties of the soil.
Published 2025“…In the control, CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation was practically inhibited due to drought (98% drop), while in the plants in which the Trichoderma preparation was used together with half dose of NPK and manure, there was only a slight decrease (1% and 13% respectively). A greatest, significant improvement in the DM of roots under drought was noted in plants in which the Pisum forecrop was applied together with NPK and manure (230% and 168% respectively). …”
-
11
-
12
Targeted removal robustness analysis.
Published 2025“…TK, SOM, SUE and SALP had significant effects on the bacterial community structure of all three taxa. βNTI increased significantly with increasing differences in TN and ALSP and decreased with increasing differences in salt. …”
-
13
The network parameter at different distances.
Published 2025“…TK, SOM, SUE and SALP had significant effects on the bacterial community structure of all three taxa. βNTI increased significantly with increasing differences in TN and ALSP and decreased with increasing differences in salt. …”
-
14
Data Sheet 1_The cultivation of Panax notoginseng enhances the metabolites and microbial network complexity in the soil of Pinus armandii rather than Pinus kesiya.docx
Published 2025“…Moreover, the bacterial and fungal copy numbers, alpha- and beta-diversity, remained unchanged in the soil of P. armandii, but significantly decreased in the soil of P. kesiya following Sanqi planting. …”
-
15
Data declaration.
Published 2025“…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”
-
16
Land transfer parameters.
Published 2025“…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”
-
17
Technology roadmap.
Published 2025“…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”
-
18
Local details of carbon storage.
Published 2025“…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”
-
19
Land-use type areas in Xinjiang.
Published 2025“…Ecological protection is anticipated to mitigate this decline, increasing carbon storage by 13.227×10<sup>5</sup> t relative to the natural growth scenario. (3) Geodetector analysis indicated that land-use types had the greatest carbon storage explanatory power for carbon storage (q = 0.80), followed by soil types (q = 0.41), net primary productivity (q = 0.32), and geomorphology (q = 0.22). …”