Showing 2,001 - 2,020 results of 23,595 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((spatial decrease) OR (small increased)) ))*', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 2001

    Comparative experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  2. 2002

    Pruning experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  3. 2003

    Parameter setting table. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  4. 2004

    DTADH module. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  5. 2005

    Ablation experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  6. 2006

    Multi scale detection. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  7. 2007

    MFDPN module. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  8. 2008
  9. 2009
  10. 2010
  11. 2011

    Detection effect of different sizes. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  12. 2012

    Radar chart comparing indicators. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  13. 2013

    MFD-YOLO structure. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  14. 2014

    Detection results of each category. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  15. 2015
  16. 2016

    Raw data. by Saeedeh Abbasi (9423189)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  17. 2017
  18. 2018
  19. 2019

    Data. by Saeedeh Abbasi (9423189)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  20. 2020