Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
14401
Table 4_OSH45, a homeobox transcription factor, coordinates low-phosphate adaptation in rice.xlsx
Published 2025“…<p>Phosphorus (P), an essential macronutrient critical for plant growth and development, faces significant availability constraints in agricultural soils, substantially limiting crop yield potential. …”
-
14402
Data_Sheet_1_A novel chimeric endolysin Cly2v shows potential in treating streptococci-induced bovine mastitis and systemic infections.docx
Published 2024“…In summary, Cly2v possesses significant potential as an alternative antibiotic for the treatment of streptococci-induced bovine mastitis and systemic infections.…”
-
14403
Data Sheet 2_Saikosaponin A induces cellular senescence in triple-negative breast cancer by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway.docx
Published 2025“…Existing therapeutic agents are generally accompanied by significant side effects. Here, we highlight Saikosaponin A (SSA), a promising natural metabolite characterized by low toxicity, demonstrating significant efficacy against breast cancer through the induction of cellular senescence.…”
-
14404
Table 4_Trends in immune cell profiles of osteomyelitis: a clinical study supported by Mendelian randomization analysis.docx
Published 2025“…Subgroup analysis revealed significantly increased lymphocyte counts and decreased neutrophil counts across all subgroups, except for the mixed infection group. …”
-
14405
Table 7_Burden of malaria in the Comoros, 1990–2021: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021.xlsx
Published 2025“…Over the past 32 years, the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in the ASPR was statistically significant at −7.60% (t = −2.68, p < 0.05). Moreover, the annual percentage change (APC) in ASIR and ASPR showed the most significant decline from 2012 to 2015, with APCs of −70.47% (t = −3.01, p < 0.05) and − 66.55% (t = −14.94, p < 0.05), respectively.…”
-
14406
Table 6_Burden of malaria in the Comoros, 1990–2021: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021.xlsx
Published 2025“…Over the past 32 years, the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in the ASPR was statistically significant at −7.60% (t = −2.68, p < 0.05). Moreover, the annual percentage change (APC) in ASIR and ASPR showed the most significant decline from 2012 to 2015, with APCs of −70.47% (t = −3.01, p < 0.05) and − 66.55% (t = −14.94, p < 0.05), respectively.…”
-
14407
Table 3_Dose-dependent changes in global brain activity and functional connectivity following exposure to psilocybin: a BOLD MRI study in awake rats.xlsx
Published 2025“…This is the first study to use MRI to follow functional changes in brain activity in response to different doses of psilocybin in fully awake, drug naive rats. We hypothesized that psilocybin would show a dose-dependent increase in activity in the prefrontal cortex and thalamus, while decreasing hippocampal activity. …”
-
14408
Control analyses of behavioral timescales.
Published 2025“…<b>(B)</b> Two location task example: We observed no statistically significant differences between different smoothing windows for the two location task, but for the four location task (two locations: <i>F</i>3,39 = 1.35, <i>p</i> = 0.2727; four locations: <i>F</i>3,39 = 32.15, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, repeated-measures ANOVA). …”
-
14409
Table 5_OSH45, a homeobox transcription factor, coordinates low-phosphate adaptation in rice.xlsx
Published 2025“…<p>Phosphorus (P), an essential macronutrient critical for plant growth and development, faces significant availability constraints in agricultural soils, substantially limiting crop yield potential. …”
-
14410
Table 1_Assessment of platelet-to-white blood cell ratio on short-term mortality events in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure: evidence from a cohort stud...
Published 2025“…Further threshold analysis revealed a threshold point for PWR at 15.88, where a decrease in PWR below this threshold was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (p for log-likelihood ratio test = 0.046). …”
-
14411
Data Sheet 1_Post-COVID syndrome patients show reduced anti-Spike antibodies compared to COVID-recovered controls, but enhanced IgG4/IgG1 switch after the third vaccine dose.pdf
Published 2025“…Introduction<p>Long COVID and post-COVID syndromes represent a significant global health crisis and a substantial societal challenge. …”
-
14412
Table 1_Unpacking the cost implications of diagnosis-related groups reform for lumbar disc herniation patients in Chinese medicine: a closer look at evidence from China.xls
Published 2025“…Objectives<p>Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) presents a significant economic burden globally, worsening in China due to an aging population. …”
-
14413
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14414
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14415
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14416
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14417
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14418
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14419
Data Sheet 1_Virological response and predictive factors for antiviral treatment in chronic HBV-related liver disease with low ALT and high HBV DNA.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>A retrospective study grouped chronic HBV patients by baseline ALT: ALT > 80 U/L (significantly elevated group, SAG), 40-80 U/L (mildly elevated group, MAG), and ≤ 40 U/L (normal group, NG). …”
-
14420
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”