Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
threat decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
threat decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search)
-
3621
Treatment with vitamin D3 reduced the viability of cancer cell lines: <i>1A & 1B.</i>
Published 2025“…Mouse EAC cells showed a decrease in cell viability starting from 250 µM at 24h of treatment. …”
-
3622
-
3623
Vitamin D3, but not the Cisplatin, could moderately reduce STZ-induced hyperglycemia in mice (a) Schematic representation of experimental protocol followed in the study: After accl...
Published 2025“…(c) Vitamin D3 and the positive control Cisplatin differently modulated FBG in hyperglycaemic mice: Intraperitoneal administration of vitamin D3 very minimally decreased FBG compared to vehicle control at the end of the study. …”
-
3624
Changes in the active H3K27ac and repressive H3K27me3 histone marks among Vasa2+/Piwi1+ and all cells in fed, starved, and refed juvenile polyps.
Published 2025“…Between fed, T<sub>5ds</sub> and T<sub>20ds</sub> timepoints, MFI levels of H3K27ac progressively and significantly decreased while levels H3K27me3 (M) did not change significantly (N). …”
-
3625
-
3626
The TOR inhibitors Rapamycin and AZD-8055 strongly reduce RPS6 phosphorylation and cell proliferation in Vasa2+/Piwi1+ cells.
Published 2025“…<i>n</i> = 2–4 biological replicates per condition, with 15 individuals per replicate. Significance levels for Student <i>t</i> test are indicated for adjusted <i>p</i> values: *<i>p</i> < 0.05, ***<i>p</i> < 0.001, ***<i>p</i> < 0.0001. d: day(s), n.s.: non-significant. …”
-
3627
-
3628
Testing set error.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3629
Internal structure of an LSTM cell.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3630
Prediction effect of each model after STL.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3631
The kernel density plot for data of each feature.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3632
Analysis of raw data prediction results.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3633
Flowchart of the STL.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3634
SARIMA predicts season components.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3635
BWO-BiLSTM model prediction results.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3636
Bi-LSTM architecture diagram.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3637
STL Linear Combination Forecast Graph.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3638
LOSS curves for BWO-BiLSTM model training.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3639
Analysis of STL-PCA prediction results.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
-
3640
Accumulated contribution rate of PCA.
Published 2025“…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”