Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
threat decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
threat decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
2381
-
2382
-
2383
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
2384
-
2385
-
2386
Data Sheet 1_Balancing conservation and community needs: challenges, threats, and socioeconomic disparities in Kakamega Forest, Kenya.docx
Published 2025“…Illegal logging emerged as the most significant threat to KFE, regardless of wealth category, followed by a lack of awareness of conservation efforts, with significant differences in perception across wealth categories. …”
-
2387
-
2388
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
2389
-
2390
-
2391
-
2392
-
2393
-
2394
-
2395
-
2396
-
2397
-
2398
-
2399
-
2400
Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and total area reduction ratio of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) during follow-up.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) During the follow-up period, the stable group showed no significant change in visual acuity, whereas the progression group exhibited a decrease compared to baseline starting at 12 months, with greater changes than those in the stable group beginning at 6 months. …”