Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1861
-
1862
Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1863
-
1864
-
1865
-
1866
-
1867
-
1868
-
1869
-
1870
-
1871
-
1872
-
1873
-
1874
Innovative Self-Powered Electrically Stimulated Fabric Dressing for Enhanced Diabetic Wound Healing
Published 2025“…These enhancements contributed to faster wound closure, decreased inflammatory response, increased collagen deposition, and improved angiogenesis. …”
-
1875
-
1876
-
1877
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1878
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1879
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1880
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”