Showing 1,901 - 1,920 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((trend decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 0.25s Refine Results
  1. 1901
  2. 1902
  3. 1903
  4. 1904
  5. 1905
  6. 1906
  7. 1907
  8. 1908
  9. 1909
  10. 1910
  11. 1911
  12. 1912
  13. 1913
  14. 1914

    Testing set error. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  15. 1915

    Internal structure of an LSTM cell. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  16. 1916

    Prediction effect of each model after STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  17. 1917

    The kernel density plot for data of each feature. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  18. 1918

    Analysis of raw data prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  19. 1919

    Flowchart of the STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  20. 1920

    SARIMA predicts season components. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”