Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
trend decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 3,361 - 3,380 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((trend decrease) OR (greatest decrease)) ))*', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 3361
    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 3362
    Anonymized raw cephalometric data.

    Anonymized raw cephalometric data. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3363
    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 3364
    Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups.

    Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 3365
    Demographic characteristics of study participants.

    Demographic characteristics of study participants. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 3366
    Results of Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) for change in parameter predicted by treatment group with pre-treatment value as a covariate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

    Results of Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) for change in parameter predicted by treatment group with pre-treatment value as a covariate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 3367
    Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

    Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 3368
    Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups.

    Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 3369
    Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 3370
    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 3371
    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 3372
    Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model results on the influence of weekly weather conditions and air quality on weekly visitation to federal parks and protected areas (PPA), including national parks, national monuments, and national forests included in this study. The odds ratio, calculated as exp(Standard Estimate), indicates the magnitude and direction of the predictors’ effect on the response variable (proportional weekly visitation). The visitation effect, calculated as -1*(1-Odds Ratio)*100 indicates the percent change in the response variable when the predictor increases by one unit (for continuous variables) or when the condition is true (for categorical variables). Significant results (p<0.05) in bold. AQI = air quality index; PM 2.5 = particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns.

    Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model results on the influence of weekly weather conditions and air quality on weekly visitation to federal parks and protected areas (PPA), i... by Kira Minehart (21029571)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 3373
    Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model results on the influence of weekly weather conditions and air quality on weekly visitation to local parks and protected areas (PPA), including city parks, county parks, and regional parks included in this study. The odds ratio, calculated as exp(Standard Estimate), indicates the magnitude and direction of the predictors’ effect on the response variable (proportional weekly visitation). The visitation effect, calculated as -1*(1-Odds Ratio)*100 indicates the percent change in the response variable when the predictor increases by one unit (for continuous variables) or when the condition is true (for categorical variables). Significant results (p<0.05) in bold. AQI = air quality index; PM 2.5 = particulate matter with diameter <2.5 μm.

    Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model results on the influence of weekly weather conditions and air quality on weekly visitation to local parks and protected areas (PPA), inc... by Kira Minehart (21029571)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 3374
    Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model results on the influence of weekly weather conditions and air quality on weekly visitation to state parks and protected areas (PPA), including state parks and state recreation areas included in this study. The odds ratio, calculated as exp(Standard Estimate), indicates the magnitude and direction of the predictors’ effect on the response variable (proportional weekly visitation). The visitation effect, calculated as -1*(1-Odds Ratio)*100 indicates the percent change in the response variable when the predictor increases by one unit (for continuous variables) or when the condition is true (for categorical variables). Significant results (p<0.05) in bold. AQI = air quality index; PM 2.5 = particulate matter with diameter <2.5 μm.

    Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model results on the influence of weekly weather conditions and air quality on weekly visitation to state parks and protected areas (PPA), inc... by Kira Minehart (21029571)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 3375
    Office characteristics and RW adoption.

    Office characteristics and RW adoption. by Yasuhiko Deguchi (3167955)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 3376
    An infographic outlining the data used for each analysis.

    An infographic outlining the data used for each analysis. by Shelby L. Sturrock (10751675)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 3377
    Average difference in mean daily exercise minutes in the week before and after the specified software transition, using different minimum data thresholds.

    Average difference in mean daily exercise minutes in the week before and after the specified software transition, using different minimum data thresholds. by Shelby L. Sturrock (10751675)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 3378
    Effect of each software transition and any hardware transition on daily active calories (negative binomial models with a random intercept per participant) among participants with activity data for all 7 days before and all 7 days after transitioning between the indicated software versions, or between two different hardware versions.

    Effect of each software transition and any hardware transition on daily active calories (negative binomial models with a random intercept per participant) among participants with a... by Shelby L. Sturrock (10751675)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 3379
    Effect of each software transition and any hardware transition on daily minutes of exercise (negative binomial models with a random intercept per participant) among participants with activity data for all 7 days before and all 7 days after transitioning between the indicated software versions or between two different hardware versions.

    Effect of each software transition and any hardware transition on daily minutes of exercise (negative binomial models with a random intercept per participant) among participants wi... by Shelby L. Sturrock (10751675)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 3380
    Average difference in mean daily exercise minutes in the week before and the week after transitioning between the indicated software versions.

    Average difference in mean daily exercise minutes in the week before and the week after transitioning between the indicated software versions. by Shelby L. Sturrock (10751675)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: