Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
trend decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
trend decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
2041
-
2042
Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
2043
Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
2044
-
2045
-
2046
Transition probabilities and class sizes for three-step LTA model (N = 432).
Published 2025Subjects: -
2047
-
2048
Model selection based on best fit.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Malaria remains a significant public health challenge, particularly among vulnerable populations in high-burden countries like Tanzania. …”
-
2049
-
2050
Comparison with Existing Studies.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2051
Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2052
UCS texts data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2053
-
2054
-
2055
Mean values (± standard deviation) of CK, CK-MB and LDH before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2056
Mean values (± standard deviation) of liver profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2057
Mean values (± standard deviation) of renal profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2058
Mean values (± standard deviation) of hormonal parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2059
Mean values (± standard deviation) of electrolyte concentrations before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2060
Mean values (± standard deviation) of lipid profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: