Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1941
-
1942
-
1943
-
1944
-
1945
Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1946
Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1947
-
1948
-
1949
Transition probabilities and class sizes for three-step LTA model (N = 432).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1950
-
1951
Model selection based on best fit.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Malaria remains a significant public health challenge, particularly among vulnerable populations in high-burden countries like Tanzania. …”
-
1952
-
1953
Comparison with Existing Studies.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
1954
Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
1955
UCS texts data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
1956
-
1957
-
1958
Mean values (± standard deviation) of CK, CK-MB and LDH before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1959
Mean values (± standard deviation) of liver profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1960
Mean values (± standard deviation) of renal profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: