Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
-
1061
-
1062
-
1063
-
1064
Mean values (± standard deviation) of CK, CK-MB and LDH before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1065
Mean values (± standard deviation) of liver profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1066
Mean values (± standard deviation) of renal profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1067
Mean values (± standard deviation) of hormonal parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1068
Mean values (± standard deviation) of electrolyte concentrations before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1069
Mean values (± standard deviation) of lipid profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1070
-
1071
-
1072
-
1073
General characteristics and clinical data of the subjects included in the study.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1074
-
1075
-
1076
-
1077
-
1078
-
1079
Fourier unit root test I(1).
Published 2025“…While conventional Granger tests do not indicate significant linkages, quantile-based approaches uncover heterogeneous connections that emerge under extreme market conditions. …”
-
1080