Data_Sheet_1_Do birth outcomes mediate the association between drug use in pregnancy and neonatal metabolic bone disease? A prospective cohort study of 10,801 Chinese women.docx by Honglin Jiang (405822)

“…</p>Conclusion<p>Comprehensive medication use during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of neonatal MBD, largely mediated by LBW. …”

Original images for western blot. by Dan Yu (214174)

Table 1_Phytotoxic effects of cigarette smoke on indoor plant Epipremnum aureum: in vivo analysis using chlorophyll a fluorescence transients.docx by Garishma Shah (21758924)

“…Chlorophyll a fluorescence (ChlF) analysis revealed impaired PSII photochemistry, as evidenced by reduced fluorescence yields and a significant decrease in fluorescence intensity at higher smoke exposures. …”

Kernel density of propensity scores before and after matching. by Ruize Cai (21615531)

The HJRB’s geographic position and elevation. by Nana Zhuang (21453325)

“…The findings reveal: (1) During the project initiation phase (2000–2010), vegetation restoration strategies enhanced soil retention by over 60%, demonstrating that simultaneous project-ecological implementation can mitigate habitat degradation risks. (2) The dam heightening phase (2005–2010) drove spatial reconfiguration of water-energy fluxes, leading to declines in water conservation and carbon sequestration in the midstream region, while enhancing flood mitigation and climate regulation in the reservoir area, unveiling the reshaping mechanisms of dam heightening on ESs supply patterns. (3) The operation phase exhibited significant temporal heterogeneity: initial operation (2010–2015) saw a sharp decline in water conservation (>40%) and soil retention (>60%) due to hydrological disturbances, whereas sustained operation (2015–2020) restored water conservation by nearly 70% and soil retention by over 40% through ecological restoration, alongside a net increase of 14.14% in carbon sequestration, confirming the time-lag compensation effects of restoration measures and the dynamic interplay between ecological restoration and project interventions. …”

Relative changes in ESs during different periods. by Nana Zhuang (21453325)

“…The findings reveal: (1) During the project initiation phase (2000–2010), vegetation restoration strategies enhanced soil retention by over 60%, demonstrating that simultaneous project-ecological implementation can mitigate habitat degradation risks. (2) The dam heightening phase (2005–2010) drove spatial reconfiguration of water-energy fluxes, leading to declines in water conservation and carbon sequestration in the midstream region, while enhancing flood mitigation and climate regulation in the reservoir area, unveiling the reshaping mechanisms of dam heightening on ESs supply patterns. (3) The operation phase exhibited significant temporal heterogeneity: initial operation (2010–2015) saw a sharp decline in water conservation (>40%) and soil retention (>60%) due to hydrological disturbances, whereas sustained operation (2015–2020) restored water conservation by nearly 70% and soil retention by over 40% through ecological restoration, alongside a net increase of 14.14% in carbon sequestration, confirming the time-lag compensation effects of restoration measures and the dynamic interplay between ecological restoration and project interventions. …”

The HJRB’s spatial distribution of ESs. by Nana Zhuang (21453325)

“…The findings reveal: (1) During the project initiation phase (2000–2010), vegetation restoration strategies enhanced soil retention by over 60%, demonstrating that simultaneous project-ecological implementation can mitigate habitat degradation risks. (2) The dam heightening phase (2005–2010) drove spatial reconfiguration of water-energy fluxes, leading to declines in water conservation and carbon sequestration in the midstream region, while enhancing flood mitigation and climate regulation in the reservoir area, unveiling the reshaping mechanisms of dam heightening on ESs supply patterns. (3) The operation phase exhibited significant temporal heterogeneity: initial operation (2010–2015) saw a sharp decline in water conservation (>40%) and soil retention (>60%) due to hydrological disturbances, whereas sustained operation (2015–2020) restored water conservation by nearly 70% and soil retention by over 40% through ecological restoration, alongside a net increase of 14.14% in carbon sequestration, confirming the time-lag compensation effects of restoration measures and the dynamic interplay between ecological restoration and project interventions. …”

Relative changes in ESs from 2000 to 2020. by Nana Zhuang (21453325)

“…The findings reveal: (1) During the project initiation phase (2000–2010), vegetation restoration strategies enhanced soil retention by over 60%, demonstrating that simultaneous project-ecological implementation can mitigate habitat degradation risks. (2) The dam heightening phase (2005–2010) drove spatial reconfiguration of water-energy fluxes, leading to declines in water conservation and carbon sequestration in the midstream region, while enhancing flood mitigation and climate regulation in the reservoir area, unveiling the reshaping mechanisms of dam heightening on ESs supply patterns. (3) The operation phase exhibited significant temporal heterogeneity: initial operation (2010–2015) saw a sharp decline in water conservation (>40%) and soil retention (>60%) due to hydrological disturbances, whereas sustained operation (2015–2020) restored water conservation by nearly 70% and soil retention by over 40% through ecological restoration, alongside a net increase of 14.14% in carbon sequestration, confirming the time-lag compensation effects of restoration measures and the dynamic interplay between ecological restoration and project interventions. …”

Workflow diagram for ESs assessment. by Nana Zhuang (21453325)

“…The findings reveal: (1) During the project initiation phase (2000–2010), vegetation restoration strategies enhanced soil retention by over 60%, demonstrating that simultaneous project-ecological implementation can mitigate habitat degradation risks. (2) The dam heightening phase (2005–2010) drove spatial reconfiguration of water-energy fluxes, leading to declines in water conservation and carbon sequestration in the midstream region, while enhancing flood mitigation and climate regulation in the reservoir area, unveiling the reshaping mechanisms of dam heightening on ESs supply patterns. (3) The operation phase exhibited significant temporal heterogeneity: initial operation (2010–2015) saw a sharp decline in water conservation (>40%) and soil retention (>60%) due to hydrological disturbances, whereas sustained operation (2015–2020) restored water conservation by nearly 70% and soil retention by over 40% through ecological restoration, alongside a net increase of 14.14% in carbon sequestration, confirming the time-lag compensation effects of restoration measures and the dynamic interplay between ecological restoration and project interventions. …”

ESs of various ecosystems from 1990 to 2020. by Nana Zhuang (21453325)

“…The findings reveal: (1) During the project initiation phase (2000–2010), vegetation restoration strategies enhanced soil retention by over 60%, demonstrating that simultaneous project-ecological implementation can mitigate habitat degradation risks. (2) The dam heightening phase (2005–2010) drove spatial reconfiguration of water-energy fluxes, leading to declines in water conservation and carbon sequestration in the midstream region, while enhancing flood mitigation and climate regulation in the reservoir area, unveiling the reshaping mechanisms of dam heightening on ESs supply patterns. (3) The operation phase exhibited significant temporal heterogeneity: initial operation (2010–2015) saw a sharp decline in water conservation (>40%) and soil retention (>60%) due to hydrological disturbances, whereas sustained operation (2015–2020) restored water conservation by nearly 70% and soil retention by over 40% through ecological restoration, alongside a net increase of 14.14% in carbon sequestration, confirming the time-lag compensation effects of restoration measures and the dynamic interplay between ecological restoration and project interventions. …”

Summary of the primary data. by Nana Zhuang (21453325)

“…The findings reveal: (1) During the project initiation phase (2000–2010), vegetation restoration strategies enhanced soil retention by over 60%, demonstrating that simultaneous project-ecological implementation can mitigate habitat degradation risks. (2) The dam heightening phase (2005–2010) drove spatial reconfiguration of water-energy fluxes, leading to declines in water conservation and carbon sequestration in the midstream region, while enhancing flood mitigation and climate regulation in the reservoir area, unveiling the reshaping mechanisms of dam heightening on ESs supply patterns. (3) The operation phase exhibited significant temporal heterogeneity: initial operation (2010–2015) saw a sharp decline in water conservation (>40%) and soil retention (>60%) due to hydrological disturbances, whereas sustained operation (2015–2020) restored water conservation by nearly 70% and soil retention by over 40% through ecological restoration, alongside a net increase of 14.14% in carbon sequestration, confirming the time-lag compensation effects of restoration measures and the dynamic interplay between ecological restoration and project interventions. …”

S1 Data - by Di Qin (107446)

“…In addition, compared with the conventional therapy group, the AT does not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events (AE: RR = 1.690, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.67–4.27, <i>P</i> = 0.267, <i>I</i>² = 44.3%).…”

Flow diagram of study selection. by Di Qin (107446)

“…In addition, compared with the conventional therapy group, the AT does not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events (AE: RR = 1.690, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.67–4.27, <i>P</i> = 0.267, <i>I</i>² = 44.3%).…”

Characteristics of the included studies. by Di Qin (107446)

“…In addition, compared with the conventional therapy group, the AT does not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events (AE: RR = 1.690, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.67–4.27, <i>P</i> = 0.267, <i>I</i>² = 44.3%).…”

S2 Data - by Di Qin (107446)

“…In addition, compared with the conventional therapy group, the AT does not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events (AE: RR = 1.690, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.67–4.27, <i>P</i> = 0.267, <i>I</i>² = 44.3%).…”

Data Sheet 1_Quantification of muscle fiber malformations using edge detection to investigate chronic muscle pressure ulcers.csv by Charlene Z. L. Ong (19920387)

Table 4_Tracing priming effects in palsa peat carbon dynamics using a stable isotope-assisted metabolomics approach.csv by Christian Ayala-Ortiz (15255371)

“…Pre-existing peat organic matter remained relatively stable; significant priming of its consumption was not observed, nor was its structural alteration.…”

Table 3_Tracing priming effects in palsa peat carbon dynamics using a stable isotope-assisted metabolomics approach.csv by Christian Ayala-Ortiz (15255371)

“…Pre-existing peat organic matter remained relatively stable; significant priming of its consumption was not observed, nor was its structural alteration.…”

Table 2_Tracing priming effects in palsa peat carbon dynamics using a stable isotope-assisted metabolomics approach.csv by Christian Ayala-Ortiz (15255371)

“…Pre-existing peat organic matter remained relatively stable; significant priming of its consumption was not observed, nor was its structural alteration.…”

Table 6_Tracing priming effects in palsa peat carbon dynamics using a stable isotope-assisted metabolomics approach.csv by Christian Ayala-Ortiz (15255371)

“…Pre-existing peat organic matter remained relatively stable; significant priming of its consumption was not observed, nor was its structural alteration.…”