Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7281
Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
7282
Results of RF algorithm screening factors.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
7283
Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
7284
Connectivity (frontal, axial, and sagittal planes) and color maps of between-group analysis of the tDCS intervention.
Published 2024“…<p>The colored edge represents connections with significant differences. (A) Maps shows decreased connectivity between left ACC and right INS in the HB-a-tDCS on DLPFC group in the delta frequency band which present large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.69). …”
-
7285
-
7286
-
7287
-
7288
Signal strength of reports of finasteride administration at the PT level (age < 18).
Published 2025Subjects: -
7289
-
7290
Time to onset of AEs in male and female patients receiving finasteride therapy.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7291
-
7292
-
7293
Signal strength of reports of finasteride administration in female at the PT level.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7294
Signal strength of reports of finasteride administration in male at the PT level.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7295
Signal strength of reports of finasteride administration at the PT level (age = 18-65).
Published 2025Subjects: -
7296
Signal strength of reports of finasteride administration at the PT level (age>=65).
Published 2025Subjects: -
7297
-
7298
-
7299
Number of adverse reaction case reports of finasteride administration at the PT level.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7300