Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Table 1_NSAID use may decrease serum Klotho levels.docx
Published 2025“…Subgroup analyses did not reveal any statistically significant interactions.</p>Conclusion<p>Contrary to previous speculations, the use of NSAIDs is associated with a decrease in serum Klotho levels.…”
-
3
-
4
Table_1_FMT intervention decreases urine 5-HIAA levels: a randomized double-blind controlled study.DOCX
Published 2024“…However, in the placebo group, GSRS, CARS, and SRS scores showed no significant changes, while ABC scores decreased from 72 to 58.75 (p = 0.034). …”
-
5
Bluetooth beacons with colour coded lanyards.
Published 2025“…During the baseline period, the time to antimicrobials decreased significantly in Kenya (132 and 58 minutes) at control and intervention sites. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Predictive Significance of Glycosyltransferase-Related lncRNAs in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation
Published 2025“…And the low-risk cohort exhibited increased immune infiltration and decreased tumor purity. Additionally, significant differences in tumor mutation profiles were observed, with the tumor mutation burden (TMB) being higher in the low-risk cohort, suggesting a potentially better response to immunotherapy. …”
-
10
-
11
Study selection criteria.
Published 2025“…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
12
PICOS criteria for the SLR.
Published 2025“…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
13
PRISMA flow chart.
Published 2025“…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
14
Group control-after intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
15
Group SFA-before intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
16
Lost cases.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
17
Group control-before intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
18
Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%).
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
19
Pre-Experiment.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
20
Group SFA-after intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”