Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
4101
-
4102
-
4103
-
4104
-
4105
-
4106
-
4107
-
4108
-
4109
-
4110
-
4111
-
4112
-
4113
-
4114
-
4115
Basic characteristics included in the study.
Published 2025“…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
-
4116
Publication bias of the risk of all groups.
Published 2025“…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
-
4117
Implementation framework.
Published 2025“…HMIS data showed statistically significant improvement in data completeness (from 62 to 87% (p < 0.001)) and decreased error rate (from 37 to 18% (p < 0.001)) after completion of the coaching visit series. …”
-
4118
Study selection process.
Published 2025“…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
-
4119
DHIMS2 data quality over time.
Published 2025“…HMIS data showed statistically significant improvement in data completeness (from 62 to 87% (p < 0.001)) and decreased error rate (from 37 to 18% (p < 0.001)) after completion of the coaching visit series. …”
-
4120