Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
6141
-
6142
-
6143
-
6144
-
6145
-
6146
-
6147
Tracheostomy data.
Published 2025“…Patients with an ET had a significantly shorter ICU LOS median of 15 days (IQR 13,17) and a mechanical ventilation median of 13 days (IQR 11,14) than LT patients who had an ICU LOS median of 33 days (IQR 30,36) and a mechanical ventilation median of 31 days (IQR 27,33) respectively.…”
-
6148
Flow diagram of patient selection.
Published 2025“…Patients with an ET had a significantly shorter ICU LOS median of 15 days (IQR 13,17) and a mechanical ventilation median of 13 days (IQR 11,14) than LT patients who had an ICU LOS median of 33 days (IQR 30,36) and a mechanical ventilation median of 31 days (IQR 27,33) respectively.…”
-
6149
-
6150
-
6151
-
6152
-
6153
6MWT results.
Published 2025“…Critical appraisal using the JBI-APT indicated that most studies had clear inclusion criteria (17/22), well-defined study populations (17/22), and valid exposure measurements (16/22), though confounding factors were often unaddressed (9/22 unclear or not reported). …”
-
6154
Flowchart of selected studies.
Published 2025“…Critical appraisal using the JBI-APT indicated that most studies had clear inclusion criteria (17/22), well-defined study populations (17/22), and valid exposure measurements (16/22), though confounding factors were often unaddressed (9/22 unclear or not reported). …”
-
6155
-
6156
Spirometry results.
Published 2025“…Critical appraisal using the JBI-APT indicated that most studies had clear inclusion criteria (17/22), well-defined study populations (17/22), and valid exposure measurements (16/22), though confounding factors were often unaddressed (9/22 unclear or not reported). …”
-
6157
Detailed characteristics of included studies.
Published 2025“…Critical appraisal using the JBI-APT indicated that most studies had clear inclusion criteria (17/22), well-defined study populations (17/22), and valid exposure measurements (16/22), though confounding factors were often unaddressed (9/22 unclear or not reported). …”
-
6158
-
6159
-
6160
Risk of bias assessment of included studies.
Published 2025“…Critical appraisal using the JBI-APT indicated that most studies had clear inclusion criteria (17/22), well-defined study populations (17/22), and valid exposure measurements (16/22), though confounding factors were often unaddressed (9/22 unclear or not reported). …”