Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
6161
-
6162
-
6163
-
6164
VO<sub>2peak</sub> results.
Published 2025“…Critical appraisal using the JBI-APT indicated that most studies had clear inclusion criteria (17/22), well-defined study populations (17/22), and valid exposure measurements (16/22), though confounding factors were often unaddressed (9/22 unclear or not reported). …”
-
6165
-
6166
-
6167
-
6168
-
6169
-
6170
-
6171
-
6172
-
6173
-
6174
-
6175
-
6176
Flow chart of research object screening.
Published 2025“…Notably, these associations were significant only in non-cancer populations (testosterone: OR=0.97, P < 0.001; estradiol: OR=1.64, P < 0.001), and generally absent in cancer patients except for older cancer patients (≥60 years) where testosterone maintained a significant negative correlation with ALI (OR=0.96, P = 0.020). …”
-
6177
-
6178
-
6179
-
6180