Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant a » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant a » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1601
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1602
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1603
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1604
-
1605
-
1606
Open data.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant decrease in BMD in the lumbar spine (1.107 ± 0.109 and 1.075 ± 0.112 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), total body (1.135 ± 0.086 and 1.119 ± 0.085 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), and total proximal femur over the six months of EBF compared to the values obtained from the same EBF group at 15 days postpartum (mean percentage decreases in BMD of −3.4 ± 3.7% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in lumbar spine, −2.5 ± 3.4% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in total proximal femur, and −1.7 ± 1.9% (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) in total body). …”
-
1607
-
1608
-
1609
-
1610
-
1611
-
1612
-
1613
-
1614
-
1615
-
1616
-
1617
-
1618
-
1619
-
1620