Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search)
adverse decrease » rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search)
adverse decrease » rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
181
-
182
-
183
-
184
-
185
-
186
-
187
-
188
-
189
-
190
-
191
-
192
-
193
-
194
-
195
-
196
-
197
-
198
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
199
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
200
Adverse event list.
Published 2025“…No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease −0.73; 95% CI; −2.1, 0.62; <i>p</i> = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; −2.6, 2.8; <i>p</i> > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease −1.27; 95% CI; −3.8, 1.3; <i>p</i> = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; −1.6, 2.4; <i>p</i> = 0.822). …”