Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
-
1701
Raw metabolomic data.
Published 2025“…In this study, we compared the fecal microbiome and the untargeted fecal metabolome of normal (BCS ≥ 3, n = 16) and thin (BCS < 3, n = 16) Holstein Friesian dairy cows. The 16S rRNA gene-based metagenomic analysis revealed that thin cows had significantly higher levels of Clostridiaceae, Erysipelotrichales, Erysipelotrichaceae, and <i>Turicibacter</i>, while normal cows had higher levels of Clostridiales_vadinBB60_group, UCG-010, Bacteroidaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Paludibacteraceae, <i>Alistipes</i>, and <i>Bacteroides</i>. …”
-
1702
Absolute numbers among CS groups.
Published 2025“…There was no significant change in instrumental birth, uterine ruptures, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or fetal death. …”
-
1703
Schematic diagram of the experimental workflow.
Published 2025“…In this study, we compared the fecal microbiome and the untargeted fecal metabolome of normal (BCS ≥ 3, n = 16) and thin (BCS < 3, n = 16) Holstein Friesian dairy cows. The 16S rRNA gene-based metagenomic analysis revealed that thin cows had significantly higher levels of Clostridiaceae, Erysipelotrichales, Erysipelotrichaceae, and <i>Turicibacter</i>, while normal cows had higher levels of Clostridiales_vadinBB60_group, UCG-010, Bacteroidaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Paludibacteraceae, <i>Alistipes</i>, and <i>Bacteroides</i>. …”
-
1704
-
1705
Trend of total hospital attendance.
Published 2024“…Month-on-month, antenatal and out-patient utilization decreased by 21,948.21 and 151,342.40, respectively. …”
-
1706
Trend of outpatient (OPD) consultations.
Published 2024“…Month-on-month, antenatal and out-patient utilization decreased by 21,948.21 and 151,342.40, respectively. …”
-
1707
Variables used for the analysis.
Published 2024“…Month-on-month, antenatal and out-patient utilization decreased by 21,948.21 and 151,342.40, respectively. …”
-
1708
Trend of PNC attendance over the period.
Published 2024“…Month-on-month, antenatal and out-patient utilization decreased by 21,948.21 and 151,342.40, respectively. …”
-
1709
Trend of ANC attendance over the period.
Published 2024“…Month-on-month, antenatal and out-patient utilization decreased by 21,948.21 and 151,342.40, respectively. …”
-
1710
Total hospital attendances by specialty.
Published 2024“…Month-on-month, antenatal and out-patient utilization decreased by 21,948.21 and 151,342.40, respectively. …”
-
1711
-
1712
-
1713
-
1714
-
1715
-
1716
Standardized prevalence* HADS-D>=8 with 95% CI by sex, time, age group, and living situation.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1717
Standardized** prevalence of depression (HADS-D>=8) with 95% CI by sex and year, age 70 + .
Published 2025Subjects: -
1718
Standardized prevalence of depression (HADS-D>=8 with 95% CI) by sex, time, and age group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1719
-
1720