Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 61 - 80 results of 446 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant bias decrease ))~', query time: 0.30s Refine Results
  1. 61
    PRISMA flow chart of the screening process.

    PRISMA flow chart of the screening process. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 62
    Forest plot of liver function tests.

    Forest plot of liver function tests. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 63
    Subgroup analysis of BUN based on pump type.

    Subgroup analysis of BUN based on pump type. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 64
    Subgroup analysis of ICU Stay based on pump type.

    Subgroup analysis of ICU Stay based on pump type. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 65
    Subgroup analysis of eGFR based on pump type.

    Subgroup analysis of eGFR based on pump type. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 66
    GRADE evidence profile.

    GRADE evidence profile. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 67
    Characteristics of included studies.

    Characteristics of included studies. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 68
    Sensitivity analysis for eGFR.

    Sensitivity analysis for eGFR. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 69
    Sensitivity analysis for BUN.

    Sensitivity analysis for BUN. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 70
    Subgroup analysis of BUN based on surgery type.

    Subgroup analysis of BUN based on surgery type. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 71
    Baseline Characteristics of Included Patients.

    Baseline Characteristics of Included Patients. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 72
    Error metric values i.e. MAPE and NMRE in JJA (main rainy season) rainfall between station data and CHIRPS data set before and after bias correction.

    Error metric values i.e. MAPE and NMRE in JJA (main rainy season) rainfall between station data and CHIRPS data set before and after bias correction. by Asnake Adane (19935018)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 73
    Forest plots of primary outcomes after negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection.

    Forest plots of primary outcomes after negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection. by Si He (3236646)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 74
    Subgroup analysis of the therapeutic effects of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection.

    Subgroup analysis of the therapeutic effects of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection. by Si He (3236646)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 75
    Characteristics of the included studies.

    Characteristics of the included studies. by Si He (3236646)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 76
    Trial sequential analysis of primary outcomes after negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection.

    Trial sequential analysis of primary outcomes after negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection. by Si He (3236646)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 77
    Trial sequential analysis of secondary outcomes after negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection.

    Trial sequential analysis of secondary outcomes after negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection. by Si He (3236646)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 78
    Pooled effect of the therapeutic effects of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection.

    Pooled effect of the therapeutic effects of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection. by Si He (3236646)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 79
    Forest plots of secondary outcomes after negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection.

    Forest plots of secondary outcomes after negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care for sternal wound infection. by Si He (3236646)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 80
    Extracted data and used for analysis.

    Extracted data and used for analysis. by Si He (3236646)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: