Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant bins » significant bias (Expand Search), significant bit (Expand Search), significant hits (Expand Search)
bins decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant bins » significant bias (Expand Search), significant bit (Expand Search), significant hits (Expand Search)
bins decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
341
-
342
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
343
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
344
Descriptive statistics of alcohol consumption in G7 countries (in litres/capita).
Published 2024Subjects: -
345
-
346
-
347
-
348
-
349
-
350
-
351
-
352
Trends of incident opioid users, L-TOT users, and L-TOT discontinuers between 2009 and 2013.
Published 2025Subjects: -
353
-
354
-
355
-
356
-
357
-
358
-
359
-
360