Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search), significant challenges (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search), significant challenges (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
-
2681
Raw data 16–20.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2682
Demographics, SD= Standard Deviation.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2683
Raw data 6–9 and 15.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2684
Raw data 1–5.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2685
Raw data 10–14.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2686
Coordination angle during running.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2687
Gait retraining with biofeedback.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2688
Coordination angle during walking.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2689
-
2690
-
2691
LULC proportion from 2040 to 2060.
Published 2025“…The study highlighted significant land-use changes, with increased agriculture and built-up areas at the expense of forests and pasturelands. …”
-
2692
Global sensitive flow parameters [84].
Published 2025“…The study highlighted significant land-use changes, with increased agriculture and built-up areas at the expense of forests and pasturelands. …”
-
2693
Modulation of performance during learning.
Published 2025“…(B) A longitudinal comparison of the average exponential fit weight between WT and zQ175 mice reveals that while WT mice show a decreasing trend, indicating a shift towards longer duration (“timed”) trials, zQ175 mice maintain a consistently high exponential weight, demonstrating no significant change over time (b; RM two-way ANOVA, genotype p = 0.0106 F(1, 22) = 7.795, days p < 0.0001 F(5.262, 115.4) = 7.616, interaction p < 0.0001 F(57, 1250) = 2.834). …”
-
2694
Raw data.
Published 2025“…Significant changes in lung functional parameters were recorded during 6–24 h with most parameters returning to baseline levels at day-3. …”
-
2695
A cycle of lung ultrasound (Video).
Published 2025“…Significant changes in lung functional parameters were recorded during 6–24 h with most parameters returning to baseline levels at day-3. …”
-
2696
raw data
Published 2024“…<p dir="ltr"><i>Spodoptera exigua</i> is a significant pest of crops, but its ability to adapt to new climates remains poorly understood. …”
-
2697
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2698
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2699
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2700
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”