Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search), significant challenges (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search), significant challenges (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
-
3381
Example of a choice set for Best Worst Scaling.
Published 2025“…In contrast, values related to power and achievement significantly increased following the pandemic. These results suggest that individual values are flexible and may change in response to external factors such as global crises.…”
-
3382
Scatterplot 8.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3383
Scatterplot 5.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3384
Scatterplot 9.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3385
Scatterplot 1.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3386
Scatterplot 6.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3387
Scatterplot 2.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3388
Raw data of this study.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3389
Scatterplot 4.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3390
Scatterplot 3.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3391
Correlation matrix.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3392
Scatterplot 7.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3393
Alignment of the Taxane binding pocket sequences.
Published 2025“…We found that the amoeba’s mitotic tubulins show a significant number of changes that are expected to decrease their affinity for tubulin-targeting compounds. …”
-
3394
Baseline characteristics of the four groups.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3395
Flow of included patients through the trial.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3396
Cox proportional hazards modeling.
Published 2024“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”
-
3397
Supplementary file 1_Spatiotemporal monitoring in beidagang wetland using Landsat time-series images and Google Earth Engine during 2000–2022.docx
Published 2025“…Frequent type conversions occurred between adjacent classes, with the most significant changes in Guanqi Lake. Despite declining wetland water volumes due to rising temperatures and reduced precipitation, ecological compensation measures, including functional zoning, water replenishment, and phragmites restoration, have continuously improved the wetland environment. …”
-
3398
-
3399
Table 1_Early dynamic changes in platelet counts and 28-day mortality in sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort study using dynamic latent class model and generalized additive mix...
Published 2025“…A dynamic latent class model analyzed the patterns of PLT count changes during the first week of hospitalization. …”
-
3400
Schematic model depicting the relationship between lipids and proteins by target gene knockdown.
Published 2025“…Although both <i>GNB1</i> and <i>SCARB2</i> knockdown results in fewer lipid droplets in the cytoplasm under nutrient-rich conditions, the model emphasizes significant changes in lipid and protein states. In the schematic diagram, significant increases are indicated by red arrows pointing upwards, while significant decreases are shown with blue arrows pointing downwards. …”