Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant changes » significant challenge (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant changes » significant challenge (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
-
1121
-
1122
-
1123
-
1124
-
1125
-
1126
-
1127
-
1128
-
1129
-
1130
-
1131
-
1132
-
1133
-
1134
-
1135
-
1136
-
1137
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1138
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1139
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1140