Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
clinical decrease » clinical disease (Expand Search), clinical case (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
clinical decrease » clinical disease (Expand Search), clinical case (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
-
1101
Primer sequences for RT-qPCR.
Published 2025“…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
-
1102
siRNA sequences and negative controls sequences.
Published 2025“…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
-
1103
Antibodies used in the study.
Published 2025“…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
-
1104
-
1105
-
1106
Demographics of the study population.
Published 2024“…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
-
1107
Table 3 -
Published 2024“…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
-
1108
-
1109
Data extracted from the included studies.
Published 2024“…Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. …”
-
1110
Risk of bias assessments for controlled trials.
Published 2024“…Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. …”
-
1111
Demographics of the enrolled patients.
Published 2025“…The success rate in the seated position without the eye drop aid was 71.6%, and this rate decreased with increasing age; with the eye drop aid, the success rate improved significantly to 97.8%. …”
-
1112
Schematic overview of the experimental groups.
Published 2025“…LDL-C, total cholesterol, serum and hepatic triglycerides, visceral adipose, and hepatic mass and steatosis were also significantly decreased in the test group compared to negative control group (p < 0.01).…”
-
1113
Overhead view of the eye drop aid.
Published 2025“…The success rate in the seated position without the eye drop aid was 71.6%, and this rate decreased with increasing age; with the eye drop aid, the success rate improved significantly to 97.8%. …”
-
1114
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1115
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1116
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1117
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1118
Funnel plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1119
Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17).
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1120
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”