Showing 1,101 - 1,120 results of 4,368 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant clinical decrease ))~', query time: 0.27s Refine Results
  1. 1101

    Primer sequences for RT-qPCR. by Wenlong Shen (9313937)

    Published 2025
    “…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
  2. 1102

    siRNA sequences and negative controls sequences. by Wenlong Shen (9313937)

    Published 2025
    “…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
  3. 1103

    Antibodies used in the study. by Wenlong Shen (9313937)

    Published 2025
    “…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
  4. 1104
  5. 1105
  6. 1106

    Demographics of the study population. by Sohyun Park (78358)

    Published 2024
    “…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
  7. 1107

    Table 3 - by Sohyun Park (78358)

    Published 2024
    “…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
  8. 1108
  9. 1109

    Data extracted from the included studies. by Jesse Hill (19929059)

    Published 2024
    “…Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. …”
  10. 1110

    Risk of bias assessments for controlled trials. by Jesse Hill (19929059)

    Published 2024
    “…Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. …”
  11. 1111

    Demographics of the enrolled patients. by Yuka Kasai (21354922)

    Published 2025
    “…The success rate in the seated position without the eye drop aid was 71.6%, and this rate decreased with increasing age; with the eye drop aid, the success rate improved significantly to 97.8%. …”
  12. 1112

    Schematic overview of the experimental groups. by Elsie D. Oduor (22521785)

    Published 2025
    “…LDL-C, total cholesterol, serum and hepatic triglycerides, visceral adipose, and hepatic mass and steatosis were also significantly decreased in the test group compared to negative control group (p < 0.01).…”
  13. 1113

    Overhead view of the eye drop aid. by Yuka Kasai (21354922)

    Published 2025
    “…The success rate in the seated position without the eye drop aid was 71.6%, and this rate decreased with increasing age; with the eye drop aid, the success rate improved significantly to 97.8%. …”
  14. 1114

    Flow chart of the literature search. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  15. 1115

    Funnel plot for scar thickness. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  16. 1116

    Network plot for VSS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  17. 1117

    Network plot for scar thickness. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  18. 1118

    Funnel plot for VSS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  19. 1119

    Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17). by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  20. 1120

    Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”